Latest Entries »

HAARP

Here’s one that’s been around for a while. 
According to several “respected” sources (ie Ken Adachi), the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is a secret super-weapon capable of weather modification, electromagnetic warfare, and several other military uses. 
Before we start, let it be known that HAARP is not secret at all; they frequently hold open houses and public tours, in addition to inviting students from all over the world for summer-schools. The official site can be found here:
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/

And now onto today’s theorist, this time going by the name of Fred Burks:
http://www.examiner.com/us-intelligence-in-national/haarp-secret-weapon-for-weather-modification-electromagnetic-warfare

Though denied by HAARP officials, some respected researchers allege that secret electromagnetic warfare capabilities of HAARP are designed to forward the US military’s stated goal of achieving full-spectrum dominance by the year 2020. Others go so far as to claim that HAARP can and has been used for weather modification, to cause earthquakes and tsunamis, to disrupt global communications systems, and more.

By “respected researchers”, Mr. Burks means Michel Chossudovsky and Dr. Nick Begich, Jr. The former is an economist who is well known for believing that Obama is a terrorist and that 9/11 was an inside job. The latter is the son of former Congressman Nick Begich, and holds a degree in traditional medicine purchased via mail from the unaccredited Open International University in India, and included no coursework or curriculum. He’s published several books on HAARP and his obsession is probably related to his father dying in a plane crash; maybe I’ll make an entry dedicated to his works.

Major aspects of the program are kept secret for alleged reasons of “national security.” Yet there is no doubt that HAARP and electromagnetic weapons capable of being used in warfare do exist.

From the official HAARP website:
HAARP is not classified. There are no classified documents pertaining to HAARP. The Environmental Impact Process (EIP) documents have always been, are now, and will always be completely descriptive of the program in its entirety. The EIP documents are a matter of public record. 
Exactly where Mr. Burks got the notion that “major aspects of the program are kept secret” is unknown.
Nobody doubts that HAARP exists; people just doubt that it’s used as a weapon. 
Currently, the only electromagnetic weapon we have is a non-lethal crowd control weapon called an Active Denial System. 

The ADS projects focused beams of electromagnetic radiation, creating a feeling of intense heat upon the target; no actual burns are inflicted (except in rare cases where a 2nd degree burn can occur) and the pain subsides as soon as the beam is removed.

According to the official HAARP website, “HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.” The ionosphere is the delicate upper layer of our atmosphere which ranges from about 30 miles (50 km) to 600 miles (1,000 km) above the surface of the Earth.

This is irrelevant. If something is used in defensive and military research, it does not make it a weapon. If I shoot a Care Bear doll with a shotgun to see what happens, it does not make the Care Bear a weapon. 
Additionally, when HAARP employees use words such as “defense technology”, they are referring to things such as missile detection.

The HAARP website acknowledges that experiments are conducted which use electromagnetic frequencies to fire pulsed, directed energy beams in order to “temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere.” Some scientists state that purposefully disturbing this sensitive layer could have major and even disastrous consequences. Concerned HAARP researchers like Dr. Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa and Alaska’s Dr. Nick Begich (son of a US Congressman) present evidence suggesting that these disturbances can even cause tsunamis and earthquakes.

Yes, that’s what HAARP does. It “excites” the ionosphere. It’s worth noting that it “excites” it a lot less than, say, natural solar radiation. 
The ionosphere is created and replenished daily by solar radiation. At night, the level of ionization drops quickly to very low levels at lower altitudes of 50 to 100 miles, but at higher altitudes over 200 miles it takes most of the night for the ionization to disperse. During the night, when the natural ionosphere is minimal, HAARP is capable of creating a weak artificial aurora that can actually be observed by sensitive cameras at the observatory, though they are far too faint for the naked eye. During the day, the aurora is incredibly weak and disappears very, very quickly.
When our two non-scientists say that HAARP can cause earthquakes and tsunamis (which are essentially the same thing), they are referring to the Extremely Low Frequency, or ELF, waves. However, the maximum ELF signal amplitude produced by HAARP has been measured at less than one ten-millionth of the Earth’s natural background field. 

To view the European Union (EU) document which brings HAARP and similar electromagnetic weapons into question, click here [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pv2/pv2?PRG=DOCPV&APP=PV2&DATE=280199&DATEF=990128&TPV=DEF&TYPEF=A4&POS=1&SDOCTA=8&TXTLST=1&Type_Doc=RESOL&PrgPrev=TYPEF@A4%7CPRG@QUERY%7CAPP@PV2%7CFILE@BIBLIO99%7CNUMERO@5%7CYEAR@99%7CPLAGE@1&LANGUE=EN]. The actual wording at bullet point 24 in this telling document states that the EU “considers HAARP by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing.” This reveling document further states that the EU regrets the repeated refusal of the U.S. government to send anyone to give evidence on HAARP.

This EU statement is from 1999, which is quite a while ago. Even then, it was a bizarre statement considering how they have a similar ionosphere heating facility in the Ramfjordmoen facility of their EISCAT project.

For those who still doubt that such devastating secret weapons have been developed, here is an intriguing quote from an article in New Zealand’s leading newspaper, the New Zealand Herald:

“Top-secret wartime experiments were conducted off the coast of Auckland to perfect a tidal wave bomb, declassified files reveal. United States defence chiefs said that if the project had been completed before the end of the war, it could have played a role as effective as that of the atom bomb. Details of the tsunami bomb, known as Project Seal, are contained in 53-year-old documents released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.”

Project Seal was never finished, and several experiments in the 1960s proved that such a weapon wouldn’t have worked. After it was cancelled in 1945, the “Tsunami-Bomb” was used as a decoy against the CCCP (I guess everybody calls it the USSR around here). The goal was to convince the CCCP/USSR/Mother Russia that UFOs were actually a secret American weapon, since project director James Leech was an expert in aerodynamics and everyone assumed the US was researching airborne weapons. This would accomplish the following objectives:
• Deterrence – Make the Soviets believe the United States had a weapon greater than the atomic bomb to forestall a feared Soviet attack.
• Code-breaking – Control the stories leaked to the press. If you control the plain text, and this plain text is encoded for transmission back to Moscow, you can attempt to break the code.
• Unmasking of spies (through watching for people expressing an interest in UFOs or through springing a canary trap, a method for exposing an information leak, which involves giving different versions of a sensitive document to each of several suspects and seeing which version gets leaked).
• Tying up Soviet Research and Development efforts on chasing a non-existent program.
• Discrediting Soviet officials who were (obviously) not going to be able to come up with any details of a non-existent program.

If the military secretly developed a weapon which could cause a tsunami over half a century ago, what kind of advanced deadly weapons might be available now? And why is it that the general public still doesn’t know about secret weapons developed over 50 years ago? To understand why the media isn’t covering these highly critical issues, click here [http://www.wanttoknow.info/mediacover-up]. Clearly the military has the capability to cause a tsunami and likely to cause earthquakes and hurricanes, as well. It’s time for us to take action to spread the word on this vital topic.
1) They didn’t develop it.
2) The general public has full access to all Project Seal documents. They don’t know about it because they don’t give a damn.
3) They aren’t covering these issues because using something that never existed as evidence for something that doesn’t exist today just makes you look stupid. As opposed to Mr. Burke, reporters actually have to pay for making blatantly stupid errors.
4) The military doesn’t have the capabilities of making a tsunami. Plus, Project Seal was little more than detonating a bomb under water, whereas electromagnetic super-weapons require extremely advanced technology.

Having interpreted to for top generals in my work as a language interpreter with the US Department of State, I learned that military planners are always interested in developing the most devastating weapons possible. Yet these weapons are kept secret as long as possible, allegedly for reasons of national security. The many layers of intense secrecy both in the military and government result in very few people being aware of the gruesome capabilities for death and destruction that have been developed over the years. There are many examples of major defense projects kept successfully out of the public’s eyes for years and even decades.

Yes, generals want big weapons. However, randomly pointing at things because you think-it-might-possibly-be-a-weapon-because-it-sounds-like-something-the-government-would-do is neither scientific nor helpful.

The massive Manhattan Project (development of the first atomic bomb) is one such example. The building of an entire city to support the project in Oak Ridge, Tennessee was successfully kept secret even from the state’s governor. The stealth bomber was kept top secret for many years, and the public still has no way of knowing it’s full capabilities. It is through the use of the highly organized military and intelligence services that the power elite of our world, working in cooperation with key allies in government and corporate ownership of the media, are able to carry out major cover-ups and secret operations like those involved with HAARP.

Comparing HAARP to the Manhattan Project is a stretch. During the summer, you can go to HAARP and see everything in the facility. You can view their website or read the numerous HAARP articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Obviously, none of this was possible during the Manhattan Project. 

Some researchers have raised questions about the possible involvement of HAARP in major disasters like the earthquake in Haiti, Indonesian tsunami, and hurricane Katrina. Could these have been HAARP experiments gone awry? Might they even have been caused by rogue elements which gained control of this devastating technology. Of course disasters like this happen regularly on a natural basis, yet if you begin to research, there is some high strangeness around some of these disasters. The evidence is inconclusive, yet with the known and unknown major destructive capabilities of this weapon, serious questions remain.

By “some researchers”, he means Doctors Chossudovsky and Begech, neither of whom are scientists. In addition, there is zero evidence that HAARP caused (or can cause) any natural disasters. And there are no “known and unknown destructive capabilities” associated with HAARP.

I do not doubt that Fred Burks is a smart guy, being a translator for Bush and all. However, this does not mean anything since much of his “information” is verifiably false.

Будем здоровы!
Влади́мир

Advertisements

Chemtrails and Sylphs

http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/sylphstransmutechemtrails06jun04.shtml

Sylph (noun)- 
1. a fictional elemental that lives in the air
2. A beautiful young woman.

Do you ever wonder what happens when a conspiracy theorist sees something like this:
Figure 1
[Figure 1]
The reasoning that goes on in their minds are impossible to explain. Regardless, for them there is only one possible answer:
Sylphs.

Straight from Educate-Yourself.org, here is today’s conspiracy theory story:
SYLPHS AND CHEMTRAILS.

Before we get to the article, let’s get this whole thing sorted out. 
Figure one shows a picture of a type of cloud known as a cirrus uncinus. From Wikipedia:
Cirrus uncinus is a type of cirrus cloud. The name cirrus uncinus is derived from Latin, meaning “curly hooks”. Also known as mares’ tails, these clouds are generally sparse in the sky, and very thin.
The clouds occur at very high altitudes, at a temperature of about minus 40-50 degrees Celsius. They are generally seen when a warm or occluded front is approaching. They are very high in the troposphere, and generally mean that precipitation, usually rain, is approaching.

The long wispy tails of the clouds are actually precipitation – very high snow in the form of tiny ice crystals falling through the air.  The wind blows these sideways, giving the distinctive hook shape.

So onto our friends at Educate-Yourself. The article was written by Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone.
This is a very large sylph transmuting chemtrails. I believe it to be the same sylph who came to Earth after leaving her/his cometary body at Jupiter…Comet Shoemaker/Levi.
The mere fact that this is considered the most logical explanation for these clouds are disturbing. The specific ‘sylph’ she is referring to is in Figure 1. 
In real life, Shoemaker-Levy 9 was a comet that orbited Jupiter for at least two decades before it smashed into the planet with explosive force. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/comet_body.html
Exactly how this was translated into the comet leaving its body behind so it could attack some chemtrails is unknown.

At most times the sylphs are transparent but when working on chemtrails they can be seen “rounding up” the aluminum particles. Over the area I live, there has been heavy spraying in recent days (June 1 and 2, 2004) and the chemtrails were sectioned off and herded like cattle. Each sphere of chaff then disappeared into a huge cloud. There were about twenty chemtrail spheres covering the sky. Each sphere was about a quarter of a mile in diameter (Thunderbirds of Earth) and they were herded towards a huge cloud over five miles in diameter (Cometary Sylph). “H.M.”, another Croft Chembuster owner, drove in from Kamloops to Salmon Arm [British Columbia, Canada] and saw the same thing I did. He said that the chemtrails over Kamloops were smearing out in the usual grey sky HAARP cloud cover but over Salmon Arm the chemtrails were sectioned off in spherical pieces. We had a good rain the next day.

Cirrus uncinus is an indication of an unstable layer in the atmosphere. The hooks have an upcurrent of around 7 cm/s, the tails have a downcurrent of more than 50 cm/s. It is this downcurrent that limits the life of a contrail, making it look like “sylphs clean up chemtrails”. Really. It’s that simple. 
These clouds are generally seen when a warm or occluded front is approaching. As a result, they are often accompanied by rain.
And they need to figure out what ‘chaff’ is.
Sylphs are transmuting air into water. Neon gas conversion to water is simple, as only two protons need to be drawn off the nucleus and chemically recombined with the remaining oxygen. The sylphs appear to be able to pull off neutrons, contain them with their magnetic fields, and use the hydrogen atom which is spontaneously generated a split second later when the neutron divides into a proton, electron and subquently emits a neutrino.

That simply isn’t possible. There is no known method of converting neon into hydrogen. Neon has 10 protons, while hydrogen has one; this means that it would have to lose nine protons to become hydrogen.
Neon is also found at one part for every 65,000 (by volume) in the earth’s atmosphere. This is a very small amount, and it would require million of neon atoms to simply make one raindrop (remember, two hydrogen atoms are needed to form one water molecule). If they could really make rain out of neon, they’d have run out a long time ago.

With such flexibility, a sylph can create water from atmospheric oxygen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Atmospheric dust, which is mainly silica, can also be converted to air and water. The sprayed aluminum particles can also be converted to air and water. The process is more involved with any number of intermediatary steps depending on the end product. The large cometary sylphs and now the sylph giants of Jupiter and Saturn are doing the same work.

Silica is SiO2. This means that to convert it to water, one would have to magically spawn two hydrogen molecules and make the silicon and one oxygen molecule vanish. 
And I am 100% certain that aluminum cannot be converted to water, and that the only way to make it a gas is to boil it at  2467º C.

We have not been hearing much about the holes in the ozone lately as Thunderbird sylphs have been transmuting stratospheric chlorine for more than a decade. Free chlorine breaks up the ozone molecule. There is nearly as much chlorine going into the air as twenty years ago but mother nature has found a solution to that pollution.

The ozone layer is still shrinking. According to Jonathon Shanklin of the British Antarctic Survey:
Recent measurements at surface monitoring stations show that the loading of ozone destroying chemicals at the surface has been dropping since about 1994 and is now about 6% down on that peak.  The stratosphere lags behind the surface by several years and the loading of ozone depleting chemicals in the ozone layer is at or near the peak.  Satellite measurements show that the rate of decline in ozone amount in the upper stratosphere is slowing, however the total ozone amount is still declining.  The small size of the 2002 ozone hole was nothing to do with any reduction in ozone depleting chemicals and it will be a decade or more before we can unambiguously say that the ozone hole is recovering…What we saw in 2002 is just one extreme in the natural range of variation in the polar stratosphere and is the equivalent of an extreme in ‘stratospheric weather’.
http://www.theozonehole.com/fact.htm
And CFCs are now being heavily regulated. 

The aluminum particle chemtrails have done nothing towards patching the holes or absorbing ultraviolet radiation from the sun. The aluminum chaff is actually containing the extra heat in the lower atmosphere and not allowing it to radiate off into space as infrared photons at night. Due to this problem the sylphs have determined their best action is to transmute the five micron aluminum particles into oxygen and environmentally friendly gases such as helium.
Chaff is a radar countermeasure that consists of strips of aluminum released from a plane, warship, or ICBM to scramble radar. It is easy to identify when it lands, and has been in use since World War Two.
And anybody who thinks that aluminum can be converted to helium has no idea what they’re talking about. 

The energies used to perform the transmutations are great. The Chembusters in this type of work become energy grounding instruments. The Chembusters link the sky with the earth and transmute some of the denser elements and dark orgone. More and more orgonite is needed to change poisonous radioactive elements in the air, water and earth. Much radiation has been released to the environment especially in Afghanistan and Iraq. The dozens of mini nukes exploded over the past twenty years all around the world have contaminated the environment.
I am unaware of any “mini-nukes” that have been detonated in either Afghanistan or Iraq. 
In addition, orgone hasn’t been scientifically proven to exist. This means that they’re saying something which hasn’t been confirmed to exist (sylphs) are using something that hasn’t been confirmed to exist (orgone) to combat something that hasn’t been confirmed to exist (chemtrails). This gets real circular, real fast.

Barium chemtrails are a problem for sylphs as there is no easy way of transmuting this heavy metal into air and water. Croft chembusters work well on barium and depositing the transmutation end products as nutrients in the soil. Smaller sylphs physically carry the heavier elements to ground. In past eras the fire, water and earth elementals would have rendered the toxins harmless, now orgonite is helping clean up the mess. There is little likelihood of elementals depositing toxins such as barium into the topsoil. That is not their plan.

See above. 

That’s all for now.

Будем здоровы!
Влади́мир

Chemtrails

http://educate-yourself.org/ct/

The above link will bring you to the site that the full conspiracy theory was posted. On this site, I’ll break it down and explain why the theory is false.

Anybody who reads conspiracy theories knows about ‘chemtrails’. According to theorists, these are chemical agents sprayed in the air and are designed to look like contrails, which are clouds of sublimated H2O that airplanes leave. So let’s see how true this theory is.

The link posted at the beginning brings you to Educate-Yourself, which is renowned for not posting evidence of its theories and simply demanding that you listen to them (they justify this lack of evidence by saying that people should educate themselves, instead of relying on them). As a result, it’s nearly impossible to argue against them, since there isn’t anything to argue. This makes it necessary to follow their links. So the first link we’ll follow is:
http://educate-yourself.org/lte/chemtrailsoverpenn04may07.shtml
This is E-Y editor Ken Adachi’s response to a reader asking about the difference between “airplane exhaust” and chemtrails.

You’re seeing chemtrails. Commercial jet engines burn fuel so efficiently that you would never “see” exhaust fumes, especially from such such a great distance, and they couldn’t possibly contain enough particulate matter to be seen as a plume.

Wrong. All exhaust systems release one similar gas: water vapour. When released into extremely cold conditions (-40 degrees C), this vapour a) condenses into water, or b) freezes directly from a gas to solid ice in a process known as sublimation. This is almost exactly what happens to normal clouds.
Plane leaving contrails behind. Note how the vapor lines up exactly with the engines.
Notice how the water vapour lines up directly with the engines, and how there is a large space between the engines and the contrail. This more or less proves that these aren’t chemtrails; aluminum, even in the most minuscule proportions, would have turned this space white, and barium would have made it green. So it appears that even the DENSEST trail is metal-free.
The normal response is then “Not through the engines, Spray nozzles are used”.
But spray nozzles are yet to be featured in ANY chemtrail video.

You wouldn’t even smell fumes if you were standing relatively close to the plane with their engines running.
Obviously Mr. Anachi hasn’t spent much time near jets. Jet fumes have a rather strong smell. Because I’m a nice guy, I’ll even give you a link: http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/388110/

How many times have you’ve flown on a commercial jet and could “see” any sort of visible exhaust plume coming out the rear of the engine? Never, right?

contrail
contrail

Notice how in both of these images the contrail is only visible behind the plane. Most airline passengers don’t see these because most airplanes aren’t fitted with rear-view mirrors.

There are now a lot of disinformation web sites on the internet which try to convince people that they are seeing jet engine “exhaust” or the “formation of cirrus clouds” from jet engine exhaust, etc.. It’s nonsense, utter bogus nonsense. The “explanations” being offered up by these disinformation web sites to account for chemtrails are so preposterous that it doesn’t deserve serious discussion.

I presume that this is Mr. Adachi’s justification for why he hasn’t returned my and countless others’ emails asking him for proof of chemtrails.

Let’s go to the next article:
http://educate-yourself.org/lte/chemtrailsfakeornot15jan08.shtml
Ah, here’s a good one. Here’s yet another one of Adachi’s replies to skeptics. Instead of evidence of chemtrails, though, he decided to educate us as to who’s in charge. I’ll let you read the whole article, but here’s the best part:
Those at the top are usually reptilian shape shifters or are human/alien hybrids. Most are not normal human beings in any sense of the word. Although they may APPEAR to be human, they are not human. Someone who has access to much higher inside information than I, had it confirmed that about 70% of the US Senate are reptilians masquerading as human beings.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………I honestly don’t know what to say to that. Conspiracy theorists, is this your source of information?

Here’s an interesting one:
http://educate-yourself.org/lte/blackberamsandshadows15oct08.shtml
Mr. Adachi seems convinced that mystical ‘black beams’ are being projected and somehow assist chemtrail sprayers. He’s wide off the mark.
These black beams are shadows cast by contrails. A full explanation can be found here:
http://contrailscience.com/contrails-dark-lines-chemtrails/
The most interesting type of contrail dark line is when the contrail is lined up with the sun. This produces a slice of shadow through the atmosphere that looks like a dark line when viewed edge-on. It is quite difficult to visualize what is going on since you have to think in three dimensions, and we are accustomed to thinking of shadows as being flat, since they are usually cast on surfaces. You are not seeing a thin dark shadow here, you are actually seeing a huge slab of very faint shadow, but it’s viewed from looking along the edge. Imagine you have a thick sheet of glass. Viewed head on, it’s transparent, but if you look at it from the edge, it seems a lot darker…Given the line (contrail) and direction vector (sun) we can form a plane that contains the line, and is parallel to the direction vector. This plane cuts through the contrail, the atmosphere, and intersects the ground. Projecting two end points of the contrail along the plane in the direction of the sun’s vector, we get essentially a two dimensional parallelepiped (although the far edge is not very well defined). This parallelepiped is quite thin (it’s as thick as the contrail), so when viewed from the side, you won’t see much. But when the viewer is in the plane of the parallelepiped – specifically anywhere along the line on the ground formed by the intersection with the plane formed by the contrail and the sun – then they will be viewing the parallelepiped from edge-on, and so it will seem to be a dark line that intersects the contrail.
I promise you, it’ll make more sense when you read the link. Here’s a picture of a shadow:
Contrail Shadow above Mallorca
Notice how in the above picture, the black beam can be seen on ground and water as well as the sky. This is more or less proof that it is a shadow.
Another problem with the ‘black beam’ theory:
Think of a mechanism that will project black into a sunlit sky. There are none. The only part of a sky that can be black is a part where the sun is partially blocked by something. Common sense can answer a lot of questions.

UPDATE

Here’s an explanation for how contrails form written in the March 1943 edition of Popular Science:
How contrails form
Contrails are formed by the exact same mechanisms today as they were in 1943, as explained above. Old propellor planes used fuel which is essentially the same thing used in modern day jets. The engines release water vapor, and contrails form if the conditions are right. It even states that contrails “can last for some time”. It also provides an explanation of how vortices create contrails. Keep in mind that even the most deranged chemtrail theorists don’t say that chemtrails have been around since 1943.

Будем здоровы!
Влади́мир

http://rozrr.deviantart.com/journal/36354432/

If you wish to see the full text, click the link above. Here, I will break it down into manageable segments.

It’s amazing what people will come up with in their free time. And trust me, they need a lot of it to come up with this conspiracy. According to Rozzr on deviantART, full-body security scanners are part of a conspiracy to eliminate the population. But how? That’s coming right up. The bolded text is Rozzr’s, and the standard is mine:

These scanners are NOT “X-ray” scanners at all! They use “T-rays,” or terahertz radiation. http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24331/

And there you have it, folks. Those X-ray scanners aren’t X-rays at all! The link says it, so IT MUST BE TRUE!!!

Hold on a minute. The link doesn’t say anything about airport security scanners. Rather, it talks about future use of terahertz waves (THz waves) for use in “peer[ing] inside envelopes, into living rooms and ‘frisk’ people at distance…the waves can be used to spot tumours near the surface of the skin.” Again, this is future use only.

There is a lot of publicity about on the Internet regarding the airport body scanners. They are calling them X-ray scanners. They are not the normal X-rays at all, they are in fact extremely dangerous and can destroy your DNA.

Once again, there is nothing to suggest that anything besides X-rays are used in scanners at all.

Please do not let them tell you the rays are a tiny amount. Look for yourself. Quote: “..although the forces generated are tiny, resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication…”

This, by the way, hasn’t been confirmed. There are many other expirements that haven’t replicated these results. And, of course, these aren’t used in scanners.

Seach for: “How Terahertz Waves Tear Apart DNA”
Judge the facts. Think for yourself. Protect yourself.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/body-scanners-dangerous-scientists/

The link here is unrelated to the rest of the paragraph. “How Terahertz Waves Tear Apart DNA” is the first link, which again doesn’t support the conspiracy theory.

The link here instead talks about how there is a very small chance that somebody who constantly goes through security scanners may get cancer. The article over-exaggerates and fails to explain just what the chances of getting cancer are. “THz waves” never come up in the article at all. As far as I’m concerned, this article is irrelevant.

Daily Mail article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1330857/Terrorists-likely-cancer-airport-body-scanners-scientist-claims.html#ixzz15iMJD02w 

This article is a little better. It states that the chances of getting cancer from scanners are about the same as those of getting killed by a suicide bomber – both are about one in 30 million. Straight from the article: ” These are still a factor of 10 lower than the probability of dying in any one year from being struck by lightning in the United States.” So I wouldn’t worry too much.

Please pass on this very important information. This is not a scam or a hoax it is for real. It is eugenics.

Eugenics is most often associated with Hitler. Remember that old internet debate rule where the first person to compare the other side with a Nazi automatically lost the argument? That was a good rule.

So, overall, here’s yet another conspiracy, and another one which it 100% untrue.

Будем здоровы!
Владимир

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!